In a letter this week, HITRUST asked the Senate HELP Chairman Lamar Alexander to consider an exemption to the Stark Law for the donation or subsidization of security software.
HITRUST asserted that healthcare entities, particularly doctors’ offices, are often poorly prepared to defend themselves from hackers. But if they could receive help from larger hospital systems, that could change.
“Small, ill-equipped practices are vulnerable to security breaches, which can ultimately infiltrate the larger healthcare environment through the exchange of patient data,” wrote Dan Nutkis, chief executive of HITRUST. “Again, we need to empower physician practices to actively manage their security posture, not hinder them.”
It should be noted, however, that such help, in the form of software or other technology and management help, could be misinterpreted as a kickback under the Stark Law, which aims to prevent referrals between doctors who have a business relationship.
The Stark Law governs physician self-referral for Medicare and Medicaid patients and serves as a stringent barrier against fraud and abuse amongst healthcare providers.
You may be interested
Improving Cloud Security with a Shared Responsibility ModelSierra Reed - Jan 07, 2019
HITRUST streamlines the process to determine who’s responsible for what security controls among your service providers By Hector Rodriguez, Worldwide…
From Providers to Patients: Time to Protect the Entire Healthcare Supply ChainLacy Deatrich - Dec 18, 2018
Written by Taylor Lehmann, Chief Information Security Officer, Wellforce The patient-care ecosystem is a complex mix of healthcare providers, payers…
New National Risk Management Center to Help Combat CybersecurityLacy Deatrich - Aug 24, 2018
Details forthcoming in new Department of Homeland Security initiative Written by Carl Anderson, Chief Legal Officer & Senior Vice President…